From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Filename with "./" in breakpoint command
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uek4qalza.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051205185556.GA9808@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:55:56 -0500)
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:55:56 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> Or, when the existing lookups have failed for a relative pathname,
> canonicalize it and treat it like a full path?
I don't like that, since it requires to chdir to some directory first.
> I don't think adding more user interaction at this level is a good idea
> - it's too far away from the user commands, in GDB's internals. It's
> been back-burnered for lack of time, but I was working on patches to
> handle location lookups returning more than one location; e.g. setting
> breakpoints at all locations matching tracepoints.cpp:25.
If asking is not a good idea here, I'd prefer that GDB tries to put a
breakpoint on all locations that match the descriptor, yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-03 12:58 Vladimir Prus
2005-12-03 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-03 14:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-12-03 14:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-03 15:01 ` Bob Rossi
2005-12-05 6:53 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-12-05 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-05 18:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-06 4:27 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-12-06 4:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-06 11:56 ` Bob Rossi
2005-12-06 14:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-12-06 14:26 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-12-06 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 20:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 20:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-06 21:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 21:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-06 22:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-07 7:49 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-12-07 14:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-07 16:46 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-12-08 20:53 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-03 14:19 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uek4qalza.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).