From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23304-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28389 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 11:46:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 28376 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 11:46:28 -0000
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:46:28 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-139-254.inter.net.il [84.228.139.254])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id CZS95999 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:46:08 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ufypu5gcb.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
CC: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <437DB556.1080008@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Fri, 18
	Nov 2005 11:04:54 +0000)
Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <uk6f7590n.fsf@gnu.org> <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511162244u5274377m70684a364a8a7edd@mail.gmail.com> <20051117140353.GA11432@nevyn.them.org> <uhdab58w9.fsf@gnu.org> <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <uirur58wx.fsf@gnu.org> <20051118030711.GB31581@nevyn.them.org> <437DB556.1080008@st.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:04:54 +0000
> From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> However, I did have trouble on the above point, while trying to 
> understand the 'Obvious Fix Rule'. It currently states that all listed 
> 'maintainers' may invoke the rule. When I queried this on the list I was 
> told that it also applies the the 'Write After Approval' list.

Are you saying that it was unclear that ``maintainers'' included
``write after approval''?  If so, why is that unclear? perhaps because
there's no ``maintainer'' word in ``write after approval''?