From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23462 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2005 04:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23440 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2005 04:29:06 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:29:06 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-15-81.inter.net.il [80.230.15.81]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BYF12662 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:29:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20051114022955.GA10567@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:29:55 -0500) Subject: Re: Formatting of packet descriptions in GDB manual Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8f2776cb0511111624h4d646cd9i1f86824c5edc613f@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511120047y50b3a273pe17ddd5c53342be1@mail.gmail.com> <20051113171247.GA1945@nevyn.them.org> <20051114022955.GA10567@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:29:55 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy > > > This is a misunderstanding: by ``typeset separately'' I meant `z 3' > > (as opposed to `z3'), not `z'`3'. > > Yes, I understand. But then you still can't search for the text of the > packet. Assuming you expect the text of the packet to contain "z3", yes. If this assumption holds for many GDB users, then we shouldn't separate the characters. That's exactly the kind of information I didn't feel to possess in order to make a good decision.