From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25931 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2005 20:46:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25921 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2005 20:46:52 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:46:52 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-136-132.inter.net.il [84.228.136.132]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BWW08379 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:46:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew STUBBS CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <436F610C.5080508@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:13:32 +0000) Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 3/3: --eval-command option Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4354DD31.3020809@st.com> <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> <20051105025059.GB20989@nevyn.them.org> <436F610C.5080508@st.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:13:32 +0000 > From: Andrew STUBBS > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > > On looking at the NEWS files more closely I am a little uncertain what > to do about the mainline file. The attached patch should do fine for the > 6.4 branch however (I don't think this needs any more, does it?). It's fine. > The mainline does not contain anything about 6.4 yet. Presumably this > will be merged across when the 6.4 stuff is completed? Any patches that are committed to the branch and mainline, should be mentioned in mainline's NEWS as well. > Should I add a 6.5 section for my changes? Only if we decide not to commit them to the branch as well. Personally, I don't see why not have them in 6.4, they cannot possibly harm anything.