From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10683 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2004 20:23:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10676 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 20:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 20:22:58 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8GKMrkS019685 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:22:58 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8GKMpr07932; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:22:52 -0400 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: getting the Dwarf 2 inter-CU reference patches reviewed References: <20040916192545.GA1061@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040916192545.GA1061@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 02:21:34PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > It would be nice if GDB 6.3 included your inter-compilation-unit > > reference support. > > > > Perhaps we could reverse the review process a bit. I could work on > > your branch, and submit patches to you for review. Then, when I've > > gotten it looking the way I'd like to see it on the trunk, we can move > > it in. > > > > Does that seem reasonable? > > It's really my fault that this didn't happen. I dropped the ball. If > you'd like to do it that way, we can - but you might want to wait a > bit; I finished merging HEAD to the branch this morning and I'm testing > an updated partial symbols patch right this moment. Whatever gets it in. If I can help as much by being (ahem) prompt in reviewing, then that's fine by me.