From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10142 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2003 05:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10134 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 05:43:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2003 05:43:29 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 70B3120766; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:39:17 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: value to function? References: <3F76FB5B.4030401@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F76FB5B.4030401@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > If the proposal to pass a function value to push_dummy_call is going > to fly there's going to need to be a method that converts an arbitrary > value into a function/method value. A new gdbarch method to be called from where, specifically? This area is a mess (just try describing the behavior of find_function_addr...), so I'm not sure what you mean.