From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32580 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 14:34:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32564 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 14:34:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 14:34:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i75EY6e1015562 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:34:06 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i75EY4a13302; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:34:05 -0400 To: Michael Chastain Cc: cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.mi/*.exp and absolute line numbers References: <4111FC04.nailD7G1U3QKS@mindspring.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4111FC04.nailD7G1U3QKS@mindspring.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 Michael Chastain writes: > Can you remember the reason that gdb_get_line_number talks to gdb > rather than doing its own scanning? Perhaps the reason was just > "it's easier to talk to gdb than to write a bunch of tcl". That was the reason.