From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4747 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 18:45:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4740 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 18:45:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 18:45:11 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i75Ij6e1021865 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:06 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i75Ij3a12594; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:04 -0400 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Mark Kettenis , drow@false.org, cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch] References: <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org> <200408050952.i759qXFK010181@juw15.nfra.nl> <20040805162734.GG1192@gnat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040805162734.GG1192@gnat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 Without stopping discussion of the best way to handle scattered values in core GDB, I'd still like to hear comments on my suggested change to dwarf2expr.[ch]'s interface, if there are any. Because dwarf2expr is supposed to be concerned with evaluating Dwarf expressions, and *avoid* building GDB data structures directly, I think that change can be assessed separately from the larger (and harder, and more important) question.