From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15781 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2007 09:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 15773 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2007 09:53:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.tut.by (HELO speedy.tutby.com) (195.137.160.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:53:53 +0000 Received: from [194.105.120.70] (account spiridenok@tut.by) by speedy.tutby.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.12) with HTTP id 421282098; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:53:43 +0200 From: "Bobo" Subject: Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached To: Thiago Jung Bauermann ,Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.12 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1193495532.5787.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071026115446.GA26327@caradoc.them.org> <20071026122115.GA28419@caradoc.them.org> <20071026143128.GA26407@caradoc.them.org> <200710261450.l9QEouxs026180@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1193410939.5787.157.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1193495532.5787.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=windows-1251;format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 Sorry i don't really know what "off-list a regenerated configure script" means and what i need to do with it to verify if the build problem is gone... Is there maybe a snapshot available with the latest changes of Thiago? (the latest snapshot version i can find on pub/gdb/snapshots/ is from 26 Oct 2007) Anyway, i would like to check if the build problem is solved. please let me know how i can do that. Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:32:12 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:31:28 -0400 >> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz >> > > Oh dear. GCC requires GNU make, but GDB is not supposed to, I don't >> > > think. This is a new problem. >> > >> > I regularly build GDB with OpenBSD make, so yes this is new (and I'd >> > very much appreciate it if it got fixed). >> >> I will work on this ASAP. > > I just posted a patch to fix this. Sorry for the delay, it took me some > time to determine if I had copyright assignment to contribute to GCC. > > I tested the change with NetBSD's make, so I think the GNUisms are gone. > If this is not enough to fix your build problems, please let me know. > > I can send you off-list a regenerated configure script if you want to > test the patch and don't have autoconf 2.59 handy. > -- > []'s > Thiago Jung Bauermann > Software Engineer > IBM Linux Technology Center --------- Âñå áëîãè - òóò: http://blogs.tut.by/