Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached

["Bobo" <spiridenok@tut.by>]

Thiago,

Please keep me up to date about your progress with this issue. I'm ready to 
test your changes on Sun Blade 1500 + SUN Solaris 5.8 i'm currently using.

I can also use gpatch to apply the patches so it's not needed to wait until 
the changes are commited to verify them.

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:12:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>

> Mmm...
> 
> The problem here is that the automatic variable '$<' ("The name of the
> first prerequisite") is not working for the decimal32.o target. It works
> for the other targets in the output you pasted, though (decNumber.o and
> decContext.o).
> 
> Looks like Solaris' make didn't like the slightly fancy
> "$(enable_decimal_float)/decimal32.c" dependency, as opposed to the
> simpler "decNumber.c" and "decContext.c" in the other targets.
> 
> I just got access to a Solaris machine and started looking into it.
> -- 
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> Software Engineer
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:01 +0200, Bobo wrote: 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Downloaded one of the latest snapshots of the HEAD release, still have 
>> problems with building it:
>> 
>> source='decNumber.c' object='decNumber.o' libtool=no gcc 
>>  -I.././libdecnumber -I.   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes 
>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute 
>> -Wcast-qual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c 
>>decNumber.c
>> source='decContext.c' object='decContext.o' libtool=no gcc 
>>  -I.././libdecnumber -I.   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes 
>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute 
>> -Wcast-qual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c 
>> decContext.c
>> source='' object='decimal32.o' libtool=no gcc  -I.././libdecnumber -I. 
>>  -W 
>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
>> -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wcast-qual -pedantic 
>> -Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c
>> gcc: no input files
>> *** Error code 1
>> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `decimal32.o'
>> Current working directory /usr/local/asm/gdb-6.7.50.20071104/libdecnumber
>> *** Error code 1
>> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-libdecnumber'
>> Current working directory /usr/local/asm/gdb-6.7.50.20071104
>> *** Error code 1
>> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'
>> 
>> 
>> wsasd179:/scratch/gdb-6.7.50.20071104 % nedit libdecnumber/Makefile
>> 
>> Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:05:25 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
>><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > It seems that Solaris' patch tool doesn't support the unified diff
>> > format. I didn't know that, sorry about this problem.
>> > 
>> > I don't have write access to the GCC repo (which is where libdecnumber
>> > is hosted), so I couldn't commit it by myself. But Janis just did. It
>> > will appear in tomorrow's GDB snapshot.
>> > 
>> > If you don't want to wait until then, you can check out now from the CVS
>> > repository by following the instructions here:
>> > 
>> > http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > []'s
>> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
>> > Software Engineer
>> > IBM Linux Technology Center
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:10 +0200, Bobo wrote:
>> >> Unfortunately i can not patch the attached file. I get the following:
>> >> shell:patch -p1 < /tmp/remove-gnuism.diff
>> >>    Looks like a unified context diff.
>> >> File to patch:
>> >> 
>> >> Is it because my version of the patch tool does not match with the diff 
>> >> version used to create the patch?
>> >> 
>> >> Anyway... Thiago, when are you planning to commit the patch so that i 
>>get 
>> >>it 
>> >> with the latest snapshot?
>> >> 
>> >> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:13:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
>> >><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>> >> 
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > 
>> >> > The patch hasn't been commited yet, so it won't appear in the 
>>snapshot.
>> >> > 
>> >> > In the meantime, you can use the attached patch in a recent GDB 
>>snapshot
>> >> > with these commands:
>> >> > 
>> >> > $ cd gdb-6.7.50.20071030
>> >> > $ patch -p1 < /path/to/attached/remove-gnuism.diff
>> >> > 
>> >> > This should get you a GDB source code tree which will build in your
>> >> > environment.
>> >> > -- 
>> >> > []'s
>> >> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
>> >> > Software Engineer
>> >> > IBM Linux Technology Center
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:53 +0200, Bobo wrote:
>> >> >> Sorry i don't really know what "off-list a regenerated configure 
>> >>script" 
>> >> >> means and what i need to do with it to verify if the build problem 
>>is 
>> >> >> gone...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Is there maybe a snapshot available with the latest changes of 
>>Thiago?
>> >> >> (the latest snapshot version i can find on pub/gdb/snapshots/ is 
>>from 
>> >>26 
>> >> >>Oct 
>> >> >> 2007)
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Anyway, i would like to check if the build problem is solved. please 
>> >>let 
>> >> >>me 
>> >> >> know how i can do that.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:32:12 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
>> >> >><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:31:28 -0400
>> >> >> >> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>> >> >> >> > > Oh dear.  GCC requires GNU make, but GDB is not supposed to, 
>>I 
>> >> >>don't
>> >> >> >> > > think.  This is a new problem.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > I regularly build GDB with OpenBSD make, so yes this is new 
>>(and 
>> >>I'd
>> >> >> >> > very much appreciate it if it got fixed).
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> I will work on this ASAP.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I just posted a patch to fix this. Sorry for the delay, it took me 
>> >>some
>> >> >> > time to determine if I had copyright assignment to contribute to 
>>GCC.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I tested the change with NetBSD's make, so I think the GNUisms are 
>> >>gone.
>> >> >> > If this is not enough to fix your build problems, please let me 
>>know.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I can send you off-list a regenerated configure script if you want 
>>to
>> >> >> > test the patch and don't have autoconf 2.59 handy.
>> >> >> > -- 
>> >> >> > []'s
>> >> >> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
>> >> >> > Software Engineer
>> >> >> > IBM Linux Technology Center
 

------------------
Ôîðåêñ Êëóáó 10 ëåò! http://www.forexclub.by