From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1506 invoked by alias); 20 May 2012 12:16:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 1496 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2012 12:16:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 May 2012 12:16:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4KCFecq028137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 20 May 2012 08:15:40 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-9-186.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.9.186]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4KCFdW6004067; Sun, 20 May 2012 08:15:40 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 4CEB85812E; Sun, 20 May 2012 08:15:39 -0400 (EDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? References: <20120330161403.GA17891@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa2rjkb8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F832D5B.9030308@redhat.com> <87ehqhfenc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120518215558.GR29339@adacore.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120518215558.GR29339@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 14:55:58 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker writes: > [...] GDBserver, however, which is often cross-compiled to bare > systems, I feel that getting a C++ compiler could be even more > challenging that on those exotic but otherwise relatively rich > platforms. Could y'all embrace a minimal gdbserver for cross-compilation bringup purposes, instead of holding back relatively rich working platforms? http://sourceware.org/rda/ et al., maybe connected tighter to the gdb build system? - FChE