From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8817 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 17:49:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8809 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 17:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 17:49:10 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 9EB47CAF5; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:49:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 6.0 issues References: <200308181747.h7IHlOcQ003903@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200308181747.h7IHlOcQ003903@duracef.shout.net> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:47:24 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:47:24 -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > About that Java bug: how about if we document it in PROBLEMS, > and also link to Tom Tromey's 1-line patch for it? I think that's a reasonable compromise. It would make me even happier if somebody in the know could look at the patch in question and suggest whether or not it's appropriate for inclusion in GDB 6.0. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com