From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18739 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2003 17:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18731 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 17:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2003 17:39:44 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 9CDE7BFE6; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: attach.exp failure References: <200308051721.h75HLXbq026687@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200308051721.h75HLXbq026687@duracef.shout.net> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:21:33 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:21:33 -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > Looks like gdb crashed or went into a loop. Yes. Running GDB on itself, I get a segfault within reggroup_next, on this line: return el->next->group; Which is consistent with the bug having appeared within the last 4 days, judging from ChangeLog entries. I've seen this on two machines now: one with Red Hat 8.0, GCC 3.2, and the other with Red Hat 7.3 (possibly modified), GCC 2.96. Both i686-pc-linux-gnu. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com