From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27607 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 16:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27600 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 16:18:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 16:18:18 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id EA1D0CAF5; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 6.0 issues References: <3F40F66E.1080508@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F40F66E.1080508@redhat.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:53:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:53:18 -0400, Andrew Cagney said: > Off the top of my head: > - the gdb.cp re-vamp scheduled for near the end of this week > - red zone re-fix > And I guess: > - something about GDB vs GCC over unknown CFI register values I been happier if the Java bug were fixed; having said that, the bug was also present in 5.3, albeit for different reasons, so I suppose it shouldn't be a show-stopper. But there was a few months in the middle where Java debugging worked better than it did in 5.3 or does currently. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com