* status of NTPL patches
@ 2003-06-27 15:52 David Carlton
2003-06-27 16:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2003-06-27 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb; +Cc: J. Johnston, Elena Zannoni
What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
9.0 yet.
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of NTPL patches
2003-06-27 15:52 status of NTPL patches David Carlton
@ 2003-06-27 16:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 16:24 ` J. Johnston
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-06-27 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Carlton; +Cc: gdb, J. Johnston, Elena Zannoni
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
> I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
> allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
> 9.0 yet.
I believe that it should work.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of NTPL patches
2003-06-27 16:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-06-27 16:24 ` J. Johnston
2003-06-27 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: J. Johnston @ 2003-06-27 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: David Carlton, gdb, Elena Zannoni, msnyder
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
>
>>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
>>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
>>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
>>9.0 yet.
>
>
> I believe that it should work.
>
They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch which I haven't
seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked in - Michael?
There is also an unresolved issue with gdbserver.
-- Jeff J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of NTPL patches
2003-06-27 16:24 ` J. Johnston
@ 2003-06-27 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 17:49 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-27 17:52 ` J. Johnston
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-06-27 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Johnston; +Cc: David Carlton, gdb, Elena Zannoni, msnyder
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:17:20PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> >
> >>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
> >>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
> >>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
> >>9.0 yet.
> >
> >
> >I believe that it should work.
> >
>
> They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch
> which I haven't
> seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked
> in - Michael?
Do you mean:
2003-06-19 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
* linux-nat.h: New file.
* linux-nat.c: Include linux-nat.h.
* lin-lwp.c: Include linux-nat.h.
Move struct lwp_info def to linux-nat.h.
* linux-proc.c: Include linux-nat.h.
(linux_make_note_section): Iterate over lwps instead of threads.
(linux_do_thread_registers): Use lwp instead of merged pid.
* config/nm-linux.h: Move miscelaneous def'ns to linux-nat.h.
* Makefile.in (lin-lwp.o, linux-proc.o, linux-nat.o):
Add dependency on linux_nat_h.
?
> There is also an unresolved issue with gdbserver.
That's a bit of an understatement... well, hopefully it won't be too
hard, but I won't have time to look at it for another project or two.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of NTPL patches
2003-06-27 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-06-27 17:49 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-27 17:52 ` J. Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2003-06-27 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: J. Johnston, David Carlton, gdb, Elena Zannoni, msnyder
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:17:20PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
> >
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> > >
> > >>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
> > >>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
> > >>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
> > >>9.0 yet.
> > >
> > >
> > >I believe that it should work.
> > >
> >
> > They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch
> > which I haven't
> > seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked
> > in - Michael?
>
> Do you mean:
> 2003-06-19 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>
> * linux-nat.h: New file.
> * linux-nat.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> * lin-lwp.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> Move struct lwp_info def to linux-nat.h.
> * linux-proc.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> (linux_make_note_section): Iterate over lwps instead of threads.
> (linux_do_thread_registers): Use lwp instead of merged pid.
> * config/nm-linux.h: Move miscelaneous def'ns to linux-nat.h.
> * Makefile.in (lin-lwp.o, linux-proc.o, linux-nat.o):
> Add dependency on linux_nat_h.
>
> ?
>
>
> > There is also an unresolved issue with gdbserver.
>
> That's a bit of an understatement... well, hopefully it won't be too
> hard, but I won't have time to look at it for another project or two.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hold tight, I am about done with another round of ala-mec-testing on
RHL9 with gdb HEAD and gdb6. I should have something later today.
But yes, they should work, modulus a little patch I am about to post.
elena
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of NTPL patches
2003-06-27 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 17:49 ` Elena Zannoni
@ 2003-06-27 17:52 ` J. Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: J. Johnston @ 2003-06-27 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: David Carlton, gdb, Elena Zannoni, msnyder
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:17:20PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>
>>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
>>>>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
>>>>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
>>>>9.0 yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>I believe that it should work.
>>>
>>
>>They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch
>>which I haven't
>>seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked
>>in - Michael?
>
>
> Do you mean:
> 2003-06-19 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>
> * linux-nat.h: New file.
> * linux-nat.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> * lin-lwp.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> Move struct lwp_info def to linux-nat.h.
> * linux-proc.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> (linux_make_note_section): Iterate over lwps instead of threads.
> (linux_do_thread_registers): Use lwp instead of merged pid.
> * config/nm-linux.h: Move miscelaneous def'ns to linux-nat.h.
> * Makefile.in (lin-lwp.o, linux-proc.o, linux-nat.o):
> Add dependency on linux_nat_h.
>
> ?
>
Yes. Didn't see a post about it being committed. Thanks.
-- Jeff J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-27 17:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-27 15:52 status of NTPL patches David Carlton
2003-06-27 16:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 16:24 ` J. Johnston
2003-06-27 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 17:49 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-27 17:52 ` J. Johnston
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).