From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7431 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2005 13:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-regex-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-regex-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7325 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jan 2005 13:44:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050126134419.7324.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "arnold at skeeve dot com" To: glibc-bugs-regex@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050125103144.693.kasal@ucw.cz> References: <20050125103144.693.kasal@ucw.cz> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug regex/693] mishandled '\B' X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From arnold at skeeve dot com 2005-01-26 13:44 ------- I'll second Karl's motion here; the current regex should be fixed to work like the old one did. This brings dfa and regex back into line, which both grep and gawk need, and provides backwards compatibility. The manual can and probably should be changed, although that's a separate issue. The compatibility with perl is also a welcome thing to have. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arnold at skeeve dot com http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=693 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.