From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-regex-return-189-listarch-glibc-bugs-regex=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31338 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2005 19:07:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-regex-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-regex-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs-regex@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-regex-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-regex-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30806 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2005 19:07:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:07:00 -0000
From: "eggert at gnu dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com>
To: glibc-bugs-regex@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20050823190740.1232.eggert@gnu.org>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug regex/1232] New: regex.h comment for RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES is incorrect
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2
List-Id: <glibc-bugs-regex.sourceware.org>

James Youngman reported that the comment in regex.h is incorrect
for RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES: when "ending range point collates higher than the
starting range point", the range is a normal range; it is not ignored.

Also, the comment isn't clear about what it means for a range to
be "ignored".

I'll attach a patch.

-- 
           Summary: regex.h comment for RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES is incorrect
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.3.5
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: regex
        AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
        ReportedBy: eggert at gnu dot org
                CC: glibc-bugs-regex at sources dot redhat dot com,glibc-
                    bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1232

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.