From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2195 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2005 18:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-regex-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-regex-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2166 invoked by uid 48); 6 Sep 2005 18:41:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050906184133.2165.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs-regex@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050821004020.1225.eggert@gnu.org> References: <20050821004020.1225.eggert@gnu.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-09-06 18:41 ------- This isn't necessarily correct. If, as suggested in another bug, the __libc_loc_* definitions are moved into a separate file where they are defined by the project using the code, then there can be locking operations defined. The correct way to do this is define a macro which indicates locking is used. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.