From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9738 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2010 07:51:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 9704 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2010 07:50:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100115075052.9703.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs-regex@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20100111094018.11159.extproxy@gmail.com> References: <20100111094018.11159.extproxy@gmail.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug regex/11159] lock contention within regexec() when used from multiple threads X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-regex-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-regex-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2010-01-15 07:50 ------- No, you cannot use TLS. The semantics is that using a regex_t in one thread after the other the side effects are carried over. If you know this isn't needed, use separate regex_t. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11159 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.