From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28851 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2004 22:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28842 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2004 22:25:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040614222536.28841.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "clameter at sgi dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20040614204748.220.clameter@sgi.com> References: <20040614204748.220.clameter@sgi.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/220] IA64: return EINVAL if ITC is an unreliable time source on clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_TIMEID) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From clameter at sgi dot com 2004-06-14 22:25 ------- Subject: Re: IA64: return EINVAL if ITC is an unreliable time source on clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_TIMEID) I must somehow missed that options. I was looking for it. When I followed your link I found the function to post an attachment. On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, schwab at suse dot de wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-06-14 21:50 ------- > Still you should follow the GNU coding conventions, and put patches in > attachments so that they can be retrieved unmangled. > > -- > > > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.