From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16235 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2004 21:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16224 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jun 2004 21:56:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040615215620.16223.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "clameter at sgi dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20040614204748.220.clameter@sgi.com> References: <20040614204748.220.clameter@sgi.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/220] IA64: return EINVAL if ITC is an unreliable time source on clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_TIMEID) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From clameter at sgi dot com 2004-06-15 21:56 ------- Created an attachment (id=115) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=115&action=view) Revised Patch. Make arch independent pieces generic. Here is a revision of the patch to address the concerns: 1. Rename the variable to signal the unreliability of HP_TIMING to hp_unreliable. 2. Make the changes to clock_gettime.c independent of what is done for IA64 so that other arches can also tie into this scheme. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.