From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16904 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2004 07:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16895 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2004 07:24:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040914072436.16894.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20040913141034.382.nemethe+com.redhat.bugzilla@niif.hu> References: <20040913141034.382.nemethe+com.redhat.bugzilla@niif.hu> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu 2004-09-14 07:24 ------- Created an attachment (id=192) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=192&action=view) Patch to avoid sorting the CFLAGS Is it documented that glibc can be compiled with gcc? Yes it is. Is it documented that glibc can be compiled with user supplied CFLAGS? Yes it is. Is it documented that gcc accepts "--param NAME=VALUE"? Yes it is. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.