public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
@ 2004-09-30 19:11 rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 19:16 ` [Bug libc/419] " jakub at redhat dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-30 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
#include <execinfo.h>
int main()
{
void *data[100];
backtrace(data, 100);
return 0;
}
-----
libgcc_s.so.1: file format elf64-alpha
Program Header:
LOAD off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000000000 paddr
0x0000000000000000 align 2**16
filesz 0x000000000000a1fc memsz 0x000000000000a1fc flags r-x
LOAD off 0x000000000000a200 vaddr 0x000000000001a200 paddr
0x000000000001a200 align 2**16
filesz 0x0000000000000f40 memsz 0x0000000000000fd0 flags rwx
DYNAMIC off 0x000000000000ac08 vaddr 0x000000000001ac08 paddr
0x000000000001ac08 align 2**3
filesz 0x00000000000001b0 memsz 0x00000000000001b0 flags rw-
EH_FRAME off 0x0000000000009fd0 vaddr 0x0000000000009fd0 paddr
0x0000000000009fd0 align 2**2
filesz 0x000000000000022c memsz 0x000000000000022c flags r--
STACK off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000000000 paddr
0x0000000000000000 align 2**3
filesz 0x0000000000000000 memsz 0x0000000000000000 flags rwx
----
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000020000006770 in _dl_map_object_from_fd (
name=0x20000159730 "libgcc_s.so.1", fd=0, fbp=0x200001af1d0,
realname=0x120012010 "./libgcc_s.so.1", loader=0x200001af140,
l_type=536865984, mode=0, stack_endp=0x11ffff1d8) at dl-load.c:1307
1307 __stack_prot |= PROT_EXEC;
(gdb) where
#0 0x0000020000006770 in _dl_map_object_from_fd (
name=0x20000159730 "libgcc_s.so.1", fd=0, fbp=0x200001af1d0,
realname=0x120012010 "./libgcc_s.so.1", loader=0x200001af140,
l_type=536865984, mode=0, stack_endp=0x11ffff1d8) at dl-load.c:1307
#1 0x00000200000076c4 in _dl_map_object (loader=0x0,
name=0x20000159730 "libgcc_s.so.1", preloaded=0, type=0, trace_mode=0,
mode=268435457) at dl-load.c:1989
#2 0x000002000013be58 in dl_open_worker (a=0x20000015231) at dl-open.c:240
#3 0x000002000000c534 in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x11ffff460,
errstring=0x11ffff468, operate=0x2000013bd40 <dl_open_worker>,
args=0x11ffff430) at dl-error.c:161
#4 0x000002000013c7f4 in *__GI__dl_open (file=0x20000159730 "libgcc_s.so.1",
mode=1, caller_dlopen=0x0) at dl-open.c:533
#5 0x000002000013df68 in do_dlopen (ptr=0x11ffff620) at dl-libc.c:80
#6 0x000002000000c534 in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x11ffff600,
errstring=0x11ffff608, operate=0x2000013df40 <do_dlopen>, args=0x11ffff620)
at dl-error.c:161
#7 0x000002000013dee4 in dlerror_run (operate=0x97, args=0x0) at dl-libc.c:42
#8 0x000002000013e030 in *__GI___libc_dlopen_mode (
name=0x20000015231 "info[20]->d_un.d_val == 7", mode=0) at dl-libc.c:154
#9 0x0000020000112b5c in init () at backtrace.c:40
#10 0x0000020000112d14 in __backtrace (array=0x20000015231, size=100)
at backtrace.c:78
----
I tried to reproduce this with an arbitrary library opened with dlopen, but
I couldn't. But I've seen this with libgcc_s.so.1 and libnss_db.so.2, so
perhaps there's something special about the path used internally by libc.
I guess this is a mixed blessing because libgcc_s.so.1 isn't *supposed* to
be marked with executable stack, but it appears that the bits that intend to
turn it off have never worked.
--
Summary: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
GCC target triplet: alpha-linux
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=419
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/419] ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
2004-09-30 19:11 [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-30 19:16 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2004-09-30 19:26 ` rth at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2004-09-30 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2004-09-30 19:16 -------
Well, the bits work on most arches:
readelf -Wa /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 | grep GNU_STACK
GNU_STACK 0x000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 RW 0x4
GNU_STACK 0x000000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x000000 0x000000
RW 0x8
on x86-64 e.g.
I guess Alpha links some .asm/.s/.S files into libgcc_s.so.1 and those don't
have the magic
#ifdef __linux__
.section .note.GNU-stack,""; .previous
#endif
in them (e.g. ppc32 has this).
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=419
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/419] ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
2004-09-30 19:11 [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 19:16 ` [Bug libc/419] " jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2004-09-30 19:26 ` rth at redhat dot com
2004-09-30 23:54 ` gotom at debian dot or dot jp
2005-09-23 0:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rth at redhat dot com @ 2004-09-30 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-09-30 19:26 -------
Subject: Re: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:16:53PM -0000, jakub at redhat dot com wrote:
> I guess Alpha links some .asm/.s/.S files into libgcc_s.so.1 and those don't
> have the magic
> #ifdef __linux__
> .section .note.GNU-stack,""; .previous
> #endif
> in them (e.g. ppc32 has this).
Yes, I suppose so, but I havn't found it yet. It's sort of annoying
that ld doesn't put this information into the -Map file...
r~
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=419
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/419] ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
2004-09-30 19:11 [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 19:16 ` [Bug libc/419] " jakub at redhat dot com
2004-09-30 19:26 ` rth at redhat dot com
@ 2004-09-30 23:54 ` gotom at debian dot or dot jp
2005-09-23 0:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gotom at debian dot or dot jp @ 2004-09-30 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|gotom at debian dot or dot |jakub at redhat dot com
|jp |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=419
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/419] ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack
2004-09-30 19:11 [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-30 23:54 ` gotom at debian dot or dot jp
@ 2005-09-23 0:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-23 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-09-23 00:57 -------
I'll close this report. I cannot see how libgcc is special and I couldn't
reproduce it. Reopen if it still happens.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=419
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-23 0:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-30 19:11 [Bug libc/419] New: ld.so crashes if libgcc_s.so.1 has an executable stack rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 19:16 ` [Bug libc/419] " jakub at redhat dot com
2004-09-30 19:26 ` rth at redhat dot com
2004-09-30 23:54 ` gotom at debian dot or dot jp
2005-09-23 0:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).