public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak
@ 2004-10-21 18:03 hjl at lucon dot org
  2004-10-26 20:37 ` [Bug math/464] " hjl at lucon dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-10-21 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

There are

[hjl@gnu-20 hjl]$ readelf -s /usr/lib/libm.a | grep " coshf"
     5: 00000000   145 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT    1 coshf

on ia32 and x86_64, but

[hjl@gnu-2 kernel]$ readelf -s /usr/lib/libm.a | grep " coshf"
    13: 0000000000000000  1616 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    1 coshf

on ia64. As the result, people can't override math functions in libm.a on
ia64 since other internal math functions in libm.a, like __ieee754_coshf,
are needed by glibc, which leads to symbol multiple definition error.

-- 
           Summary: IA64 math functions aren't weak
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.3.3
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: math
        AssignedTo: aj at suse dot de
        ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
 GCC build triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug math/464] IA64 math functions aren't weak
  2004-10-21 18:03 [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-10-26 20:37 ` hjl at lucon dot org
  2004-11-30 11:09 ` schwab@suse.de
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-10-26 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2004-10-26 20:37 -------
A patch is posted at

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2004-10/msg00158.html

-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug math/464] IA64 math functions aren't weak
  2004-10-21 18:03 [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak hjl at lucon dot org
  2004-10-26 20:37 ` [Bug math/464] " hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-11-30 11:09 ` schwab@suse.de
  2005-01-06 11:34 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  2005-01-07  6:38 ` aj at suse dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: schwab@suse.de @ 2004-11-30 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-11-30 11:09 -------
Bug 592 has a better fix. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |592


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug math/464] IA64 math functions aren't weak
  2004-10-21 18:03 [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak hjl at lucon dot org
  2004-10-26 20:37 ` [Bug math/464] " hjl at lucon dot org
  2004-11-30 11:09 ` schwab@suse.de
@ 2005-01-06 11:34 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  2005-01-07  6:38 ` aj at suse dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-01-06 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs



-- 
Bug 464 depends on bug 592, which changed state.

Bug 592 Summary: ia64 math library needs updating
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=592

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug math/464] IA64 math functions aren't weak
  2004-10-21 18:03 [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak hjl at lucon dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-06 11:34 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2005-01-07  6:38 ` aj at suse dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2005-01-07  6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de  2005-01-07 06:38 -------
This should be fixed as part of #592.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-07  6:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-21 18:03 [Bug math/464] New: IA64 math functions aren't weak hjl at lucon dot org
2004-10-26 20:37 ` [Bug math/464] " hjl at lucon dot org
2004-11-30 11:09 ` schwab@suse.de
2005-01-06 11:34 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2005-01-07  6:38 ` aj at suse dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).