public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions @ 2004-12-06 12:21 rpjday at mindspring dot com 2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: rpjday at mindspring dot com @ 2004-12-06 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs the "configure" file from the most recent glibc snapshot (20041204) does version checking on various binutils utilities and rejects the version numbers of both "as" and "ld" since it still only handles version numbers of the form "2.1[3-9]*" this should be extended to accept snapshot version numbers as well, no? -- Summary: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: libc AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp ReportedBy: rpjday at mindspring dot com CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/598] glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions 2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com @ 2004-12-19 11:33 ` aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 11:32 ------- What is the output of: ld --version as --version for you? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gotom at debian dot or dot |aj at suse dot de |jp | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/598] glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions 2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com 2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 14:06 ------- I just tried with current binutils CVS and glibc CVS and this works perfectly fine: checking for /opt/binutils/bin/as... /opt/binutils/bin/as checking version of /opt/binutils/bin/as... 2.15.94, ok checking for /opt/binutils/bin/ld... /opt/binutils/bin/ld checking version of /opt/binutils/bin/ld... 2.15.94, ok I'm closing the report therefore. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-19 14:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com 2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).