public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions
@ 2004-12-06 12:21 rpjday at mindspring dot com
2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de
2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rpjday at mindspring dot com @ 2004-12-06 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
the "configure" file from the most recent glibc snapshot (20041204) does
version checking on various binutils utilities and rejects the version numbers
of both "as" and "ld" since it still only handles version numbers of the form
"2.1[3-9]*"
this should be extended to accept snapshot version numbers as well, no?
--
Summary: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils
snapshot versions
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
ReportedBy: rpjday at mindspring dot com
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/598] glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions
2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com
@ 2004-12-19 11:33 ` aj at suse dot de
2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 11:32 -------
What is the output of:
ld --version
as --version
for you?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|gotom at debian dot or dot |aj at suse dot de
|jp |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/598] glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions
2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com
2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de
@ 2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de 2004-12-19 14:06 -------
I just tried with current binutils CVS and glibc CVS and this works perfectly
fine:
checking for /opt/binutils/bin/as... /opt/binutils/bin/as
checking version of /opt/binutils/bin/as... 2.15.94, ok
checking for /opt/binutils/bin/ld... /opt/binutils/bin/ld
checking version of /opt/binutils/bin/ld... 2.15.94, ok
I'm closing the report therefore.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=598
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-19 14:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 12:21 [Bug libc/598] New: glibc-20041204 snapshot does not recognize binutils snapshot versions rpjday at mindspring dot com
2004-12-19 11:33 ` [Bug libc/598] " aj at suse dot de
2004-12-19 14:07 ` aj at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).