public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up
@ 2004-09-13 14:10 nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
  2004-09-13 19:02 ` [Bug libc/382] " roland at gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu @ 2004-09-13 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

If I specify CFLAGS="-O2 --param max-reload-search-insns=200" for configure,
during make, gcc will be run with "--param -O2 max-reload-search-insns=200" and
so the compilation fails.

-- 
           Summary: CFLAGS messed up
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
        ReportedBy: nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up
  2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
@ 2004-09-13 19:02 ` roland at gnu dot org
  2004-09-14  7:24 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: roland at gnu dot org @ 2004-09-13 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org  2004-09-13 19:02 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 333 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up
  2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
  2004-09-13 19:02 ` [Bug libc/382] " roland at gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-14  7:24 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
  2004-09-14  7:29 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu @ 2004-09-14  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu  2004-09-14 07:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=192)
 --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=192&action=view)
Patch to avoid sorting the CFLAGS

Is it documented that glibc can be compiled with gcc? Yes it is.

Is it documented that glibc can be compiled with user supplied CFLAGS? Yes it
is.

Is it documented that gcc accepts "--param NAME=VALUE"? Yes it is.


-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up
  2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
  2004-09-13 19:02 ` [Bug libc/382] " roland at gnu dot org
  2004-09-14  7:24 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
@ 2004-09-14  7:29 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
  2004-09-27 13:03 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-12-19 15:06 ` aj at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu @ 2004-09-14  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu  2004-09-14 07:29 -------
Not related to bug #333

I fully understand why my build fails.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up
  2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-14  7:29 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
@ 2004-09-27 13:03 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-12-19 15:06 ` aj at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-09-27 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-09-27 13:03 -------
You can use --param=foo instead. 

-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/382] CFLAGS messed up
  2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-27 13:03 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-12-19 15:06 ` aj at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2004-12-19 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de  2004-12-19 15:06 -------
Fixed according to comments #3 and #4.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-19 15:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-13 14:10 [Bug libc/382] New: CFLAGS messed up nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
2004-09-13 19:02 ` [Bug libc/382] " roland at gnu dot org
2004-09-14  7:24 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
2004-09-14  7:29 ` nemethe+com dot redhat dot bugzilla at niif dot hu
2004-09-27 13:03 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-12-19 15:06 ` aj at suse dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).