From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7428 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2004 12:52:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7373 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2004 12:51:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041220125152.7372.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jakub at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20041022181914.467.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20041022181914.467.mmazur@kernel.pl> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/467] Build fails on sparc when gcc supports comdat X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2004-12-20 12:51 ------- Actually, I should follow up. IMHO the right thing is in GCC to: - if (flags & SECTION_MERGE) + if ((flags & SECTION_MERGE) + || (HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP && (flags & SECTION_LINKONCE))) in GCC HEAD's sparc_elf_asm_named_section and then glibc can cope with this, but it first needs to know what GCC 4+ behaviour will be in this case. So, if you want to resolve this, please test and submit a GCC HEAD patch along those lines. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |SUSPENDED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.