From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30769 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 17:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30681 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2005 17:54:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050228175404.30680.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050228095503.774.sebastien.decugis@ext.bull.net> References: <20050228095503.774.sebastien.decugis@ext.bull.net> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug nptl/774] sem_open returns ENOMEM instead of ENOSPC X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-02-28 17:54 ------- ENOSPC has a different meaning. It means there is no space on a device. Of course it could mean that the spec is simply inconsistent and that it is meant, for sem_open, to denote missing memory as well. But this is anything but clear. I'll suspend the bug. Somebody needs to file an interpretation request with the Austin group to get this resolved. If you don't want to do this, close the bug since nothing will change. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |SUSPENDED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=774 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.