From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31113 invoked by alias); 22 May 2005 23:08:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31098 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2005 23:07:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 23:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050522230759.31097.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jakub at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050522223124.961.ldv@altlinux.org> References: <20050522223124.961.ldv@altlinux.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/961] sendfile() and sendfile64() wrongly have __nonnull((3)) declaration X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-05-22 23:07 ------- Yes, libc-alpha is the right place to post patches. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=961 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.