From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22844 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2005 11:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22777 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jun 2005 11:01:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050628110105.22776.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jss at ast dot cam dot ac dot uk" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050616134544.1014.jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> References: <20050616134544.1014.jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/1014] RPC_ANYSOCK does not respect /etc/services X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jss at ast dot cam dot ac dot uk 2005-06-28 11:01 ------- Is it sensible to have some sort of configuration to specify the range of ports you want to use, or a list to exclude? It's annoying to have to specify ports for each RPC daemon, and many RPC daemons don't have this option. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jss at ast dot cam dot ac | |dot uk http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.