From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17237 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2005 22:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17194 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2005 22:20:50 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050901222050.17192.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "eggert at gnu dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050831224259.1281.eggert@gnu.org> References: <20050831224259.1281.eggert@gnu.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug regex/1281] support 64-bit hosts when regex code when used outside glibc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org 2005-09-01 22:20 ------- Also please see the patch in bug 1287, which fixes a glitch introduced in patch 1281. The glitch affects only code compiled outside glibc, and only when compiled with _REGEX_LARGE_OFFSETS defined. I should also mention that I checked that the 1281 patch introduced zero changes to the regex code when compiled outside glibc, unless you define the new _REGEX_LARGE_OFFSETS feature-test macro. I checked this by inspecting the assembly-language code generated both before and after the change. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1281 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.