From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23289 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2005 22:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23266 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2005 22:37:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050901223705.23264.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "eggert at gnu dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050712070250.1060.eggert@gnu.org> References: <20050712070250.1060.eggert@gnu.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/1060] sysdeps/generic/glob.c merge from gnulib (part 1 of 3) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org 2005-09-01 22:37 ------- Yes, renaming LOGIN_NAME_MAX is fine. I've installed the revised patch with GET_LOGIN_NAME_MAX into gnulib. Thanks. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1060 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.