From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5890 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2005 18:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5831 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2005 18:05:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051014180517.5830.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-10-14 18:05 ------- I really have no interest to get in the middle of all this. The extension @classic seems indeed to be wrong to me from what I read. And there is already a Belarusian locale. Unless this second language variant is the official one (which I doubt it is) it is best to just collect a tarball with all the appropriate files and distribute it separately. There is nothing a separately distribute locale source file cannot do if it is compiled using localedef upon installation. Adding variants like this (as opposed to Latin vs Cyrillic, for instance) would mean we open ourselves to all kind of fights like this. So, unless I get some really convincing arguments I'll close this as WONTFIX. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drepper at redhat dot com Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.