From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-3520-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 717 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2005 14:21:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 684 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2005 14:20:56 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:21:00 -0000
From: "michael dot kerrisk at gmx dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20051024142054.1535.michael.kerrisk@gmx.net>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/1535] New: Make _SC_CHILD_MAX retort RLIMIT_NPROC soft resource limit?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

(On Linux/x86), sysconf(_SC_CHILD_MAX) always reports 999, regardless of the
current setting of the RLIMIT_NPROC soft resource limit.  Would it not make more
sense to return the current value of the RLIMIT_NPROC soft resource limit?

-- 
           Summary: Make _SC_CHILD_MAX retort RLIMIT_NPROC soft resource
                    limit?
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.3.4
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: michael dot kerrisk at gmx dot net
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1535

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.