From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15535 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 12:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15519 invoked by uid 48); 9 Dec 2005 12:01:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051209120140.15518.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "kukuk at suse dot de" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051202172121.1970.burnus@gmx.de> References: <20051202172121.1970.burnus@gmx.de> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/1970] getgrnam_r() and groups with more than 1024 bytes X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kukuk at suse dot de 2005-12-09 12:01 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > _SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX = 2048 > > mygetgrnam("testg", 1024) returned: ERANGE > > Hmm, _SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX = 2048 is interesting. It's because your test program you submitted contains "2*" > I get the crash only with compat, with file I also get ERANGE. So why did you wrote something complete different in the initial comment? "(independent of group:files vs. group:compat)". What is now the truth? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1970 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.