public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:09:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051213230910.7480.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> ------- Additional Comments From yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-12-13 23:09 ------- Let me re-iterate (and bring this back to topic): I am, generally, *in* *favour* of this separation of locales. The way I see it, if folks want their very own sub-locale, then okay and good riddance. There's already latin-scripted sub-locale approved, created, I hear, for the userbase that is yet to emerge one day. So why not one extra? But then, the initially proposed "classic" qualifier is inappropriate and unmerited, either measured by popular support or by usage tradition. And google hits aren't relevant at all to this exact question of being or not being classic. Other things, and quite material at that, are. Be it noticed, I do *not* accept even the general quality of Mr.Shupa's expoundations. But that kind of discussion would be well out of scope of this issue. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 23:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-06-16 15:12 [Bug localedata/1015] New: " mikhailian at altern dot org 2005-06-16 20:49 ` [Bug localedata/1015] " barbier at linuxfr dot org 2005-06-22 0:27 ` mikhailian at altern dot org 2005-07-12 9:21 ` yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-08-03 13:26 ` adiel at nospam dot kiev dot ua 2005-08-03 13:31 ` kas at altlinux dot org 2005-08-03 13:55 ` cactus at narod dot ru 2005-08-04 9:35 ` yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-10-14 18:05 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2005-10-18 8:25 ` yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-12-08 13:45 ` ShupaS at rferl dot org 2005-12-13 23:09 ` yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com [this message] 2005-12-14 8:35 ` viksia at gmail dot com 2005-12-26 12:24 ` yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2006-11-09 11:47 ` ihar dot hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2006-11-13 10:41 ` ihar dot hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2007-12-19 21:02 ` ihar dot hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2008-05-17 5:33 ` 375gnu at gmail dot com 2008-05-31 14:01 ` ihar dot hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2009-10-23 20:29 ` ihar dot hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2009-10-23 20:42 ` jekhor at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 17:12 ` 375gnu at gmail dot com [not found] <bug-1015-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2010-11-06 12:46 ` pasky at suse dot cz 2010-11-06 13:15 ` ihar.hrachyshka at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 15:50 ` pasky at ucw dot cz 2012-04-04 15:51 ` pasky at ucw dot cz 2012-12-28 19:11 ` 375gnu at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051213230910.7480.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).