From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7497 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2005 23:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7481 invoked by uid 48); 13 Dec 2005 23:09:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051213230910.7480.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-12-13 23:09 ------- Let me re-iterate (and bring this back to topic): I am, generally, *in* *favour* of this separation of locales. The way I see it, if folks want their very own sub-locale, then okay and good riddance. There's already latin-scripted sub-locale approved, created, I hear, for the userbase that is yet to emerge one day. So why not one extra? But then, the initially proposed "classic" qualifier is inappropriate and unmerited, either measured by popular support or by usage tradition. And google hits aren't relevant at all to this exact question of being or not being classic. Other things, and quite material at that, are. Be it noticed, I do *not* accept even the general quality of Mr.Shupa's expoundations. But that kind of discussion would be well out of scope of this issue. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.