From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28359 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2005 06:11:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 28352 invoked by uid 48); 23 Dec 2005 06:11:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051223061150.28351.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051024142054.1535.michael.kerrisk@gmx.net> References: <20051024142054.1535.michael.kerrisk@gmx.net> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/1535] Make _SC_CHILD_MAX retort RLIMIT_NPROC soft resource limit? X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-12-23 06:11 ------- Tell this to the kernel people. It's which defines the value. It's wrong that 999 signals no limit, this is what -1 does. Or even better, no definition of the macro at all. This macro is used in the solaris emulation sysconf implementation and it returns the wrong value, too. There is nothing the userlevel code should do. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1535 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.