From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7148 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2006 18:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7137 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2006 18:02:14 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:02:00 -0000 From: "aj at suse dot de" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20060115180214.2154.aj@suse.de> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug math/2154] New: accuracy of cacoshl is bad. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 List-Id: Adding these tests to math/libm-test.inc's cacosh_test gives upto 770 ULPs for the long double tests: TEST_c_c (cacosh, 0.3, 0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L, 1.29016676450309079292712537938218583L); TEST_c_c (cacosh, -0.3, 0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L, 1.85142588908670244553551800389731705L); TEST_c_c (cacosh, 0.3, -0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L, -1.29016676450309079292712537938218583L); TEST_c_c (cacosh, -0.3, -0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L, -1.85142588908670244553551800389731705L); the float and double tests pass, just long double has this problem. -- Summary: accuracy of cacoshl is bad. Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: math AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com ReportedBy: aj at suse dot de CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2154 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.