From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8167 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2006 15:23:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8159 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2006 15:23:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060208152320.8158.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "decimal at us dot ibm dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060208105701.2296.cees@gatso.nl> References: <20060208105701.2296.cees@gatso.nl> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/2296] semval could become negative X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From decimal at us dot ibm dot com 2006-02-08 15:23 ------- The System V IPC operations are not implemented by glibc. Taking semget() as an example. sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/semget.c simply makes a Linux system call. sysvipc/semget.c returns ENOSYS for systems using glibc which provide no other implementation. Similarly the manual pages for these operations are not owned by glibc. You should pursue this issue with your distro or LKML I imagine. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2296 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.