From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25591 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2006 04:03:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 25580 invoked by uid 48); 20 Feb 2006 04:03:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 04:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060220040306.25579.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "sandals at crustytoothpaste dot ath dot cx" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060220024215.2363.sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> References: <20060220024215.2363.sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/2363] EOPNOTSUPP and ENOTSUP in errno.h must be different, according to SUSv3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From sandals at crustytoothpaste dot ath dot cx 2006-02-20 04:03 ------- If this is part of the ABI, then the ABI is broken. Just because things have always been one way does not mean that way is right, or even acceptable; an argument from tradition is a logical fallacy. Currently glibc claims to support SUSv3, by setting _POSIX_VERSION to 200112L. If it is not your intention to fix this, then please don't lie to the programmer and tell them you support a standard which you do not. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.