From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3427 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2006 03:12:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 3413 invoked by uid 48); 23 Feb 2006 03:12:53 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:12:00 -0000 From: "vapier at gentoo dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20060223031252.2386.vapier@gentoo.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/2386] New: ia64/clone2: make sure child_stack is non-NULL X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 List-Id: playing with uClibc/ia64 and i noticed that a test case we have for testing the return value of clone() when given bum arguments was failing ... seems the clone2() function in ia64 never verifies child_stack like all other architectures attached patch adds a check for child_stack alongside the check for child_fn ... i know squat about ia64 assembly so i'd be surprised if this was correct :) also, this is the first test case ive written for glibc, so it too may have quirks -- Summary: ia64/clone2: make sure child_stack is non-NULL Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libc AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com,hjl at lucon dot org GCC host triplet: ia64-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2386 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.