From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1512 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2006 22:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 1495 invoked by uid 48); 8 Mar 2006 22:06:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060308220601.1494.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "barbier at linuxfr dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060223121603.2388.mmarek@suse.cz> References: <20060223121603.2388.mmarek@suse.cz> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/2388] [PATCH] week-ndays;week-1stday;week-1stweek data for some locales X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From barbier at linuxfr dot org 2006-03-08 22:05 ------- Other informations are also available at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80212 Anyway locale writers are still in the dark because it is unclear whether GNU libc is going to follow this ISO 14652 technical report or not. In Debian, only first_weekday is taken into account, the week keyword is ignored for now until GTK is fixed. Michal, you may have a look at http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/first_weekday.diff?op=file our patch differs from yours for many locales. One reason may be that your patch is derived from a PO file and is thus language-based whereas this feature is really country-based, consider fr_CA for instance. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2388 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.