From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24602 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2006 20:18:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 24593 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2006 20:18:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060315201813.24592.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rsa at us dot ibm dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20040610193839.214.dlstevens@us.ibm.com> References: <20040610193839.214.dlstevens@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/214] sbrk() doesn't detect brk() failures. Malloc doesn't handle sbrk() failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2006-03-15 20:18 ------- David, Sure I'll see what I can whip up. Thanks for responding. btw I was implying that the man-page's information is wrong/outdated with-regard-to RLIMIT_DATA soft-limit, not that you actually interpreted it wrong. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.