From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13161 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2006 19:59:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 13151 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2006 19:59:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060320195902.13150.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rsa at us dot ibm dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20040610193839.214.dlstevens@us.ibm.com> References: <20040610193839.214.dlstevens@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/214] sbrk() doesn't detect brk() failures. Malloc doesn't handle sbrk() failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2006-03-20 19:59 ------- I've verified the same behavior on i386 as well. David, Can you take a look at my previous test/posting and let me know if you're satisfied with the resolution? RLIMIT_AS seems to do what you wanted to do in the first place. It seems that the SEGV you were experiencing is either fixed or you were getting a SEGV for another reason. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.