public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads
@ 2006-04-25  9:27 Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  2006-04-25  9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2006-04-25  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

Hi,

linuxthreads have been moved from "ports" into separated "linuxthreads" module.
Unfortunately, there are snapshot only of main (glibc-latest.tar.bz2)
and ports (glibc-ports-latest.tar.bz2) modules.

Could be also snapshot of linuxthreads generated (i.e.
glibc-linuxthreads-latest.tar.bz2).
Similar also holds for linuxthreads in  2.4 and above releases.

Thanks

Petr

-- 
           Summary: no snapshot for linuxthreads
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: admin
        AssignedTo: roland at gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads
  2006-04-25  9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
@ 2006-04-25  9:45 ` roland at gnu dot org
  2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: roland at gnu dot org @ 2006-04-25  9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org  2006-04-25 09:45 -------
Should be set for next week's snapshot (this Monday's run already happened).
Please check that it comes out right next time, and close this bug if so.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads
  2006-04-25  9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  2006-04-25  9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2006-05-01 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz  2006-05-01 14:44 -------
> Should be set for next week's snapshot (this Monday's run already happened).
> Please check that it comes out right next time, and close this bug if so.

HEAD snapshot looks OK.
But there is also (empty) 2.3 branch snapshot, it is at least confusing.

Petr





-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads
  2006-04-25  9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  2006-04-25  9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org
  2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
@ 2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-09-02 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org  2010-09-02 15:57 -------
linuxthreads is dead.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-02 15:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-25  9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
2006-04-25  9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org
2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).