public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads
@ 2006-04-25 9:27 Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
2006-04-25 9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2006-04-25 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
Hi,
linuxthreads have been moved from "ports" into separated "linuxthreads" module.
Unfortunately, there are snapshot only of main (glibc-latest.tar.bz2)
and ports (glibc-ports-latest.tar.bz2) modules.
Could be also snapshot of linuxthreads generated (i.e.
glibc-linuxthreads-latest.tar.bz2).
Similar also holds for linuxthreads in 2.4 and above releases.
Thanks
Petr
--
Summary: no snapshot for linuxthreads
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: admin
AssignedTo: roland at gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads 2006-04-25 9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2006-04-25 9:45 ` roland at gnu dot org 2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: roland at gnu dot org @ 2006-04-25 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org 2006-04-25 09:45 ------- Should be set for next week's snapshot (this Monday's run already happened). Please check that it comes out right next time, and close this bug if so. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |SUSPENDED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads 2006-04-25 9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2006-04-25 9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org @ 2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2006-05-01 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2006-05-01 14:44 ------- > Should be set for next week's snapshot (this Monday's run already happened). > Please check that it comes out right next time, and close this bug if so. HEAD snapshot looks OK. But there is also (empty) 2.3 branch snapshot, it is at least confusing. Petr -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|SUSPENDED |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug admin/2605] no snapshot for linuxthreads 2006-04-25 9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2006-04-25 9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org 2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz @ 2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-09-02 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-09-02 15:57 ------- linuxthreads is dead. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2605 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-02 15:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-04-25 9:27 [Bug admin/2605] New: no snapshot for linuxthreads Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2006-04-25 9:45 ` [Bug admin/2605] " roland at gnu dot org 2006-05-01 14:44 ` Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz 2010-09-02 15:57 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).