public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug libc/2633] New: _GLIBCPP_USE_NAMESPACES issues
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 17:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060502170845.2633.marc.glisse@normalesup.org> (raw)

Hello,
I tried to define the _GLIBCPP_USE_NAMESPACES macro for c++ and hit several
problems. Here are some of them (I should have taken notes...).

In stdio.h, there is "typedef struct _IO_FILE FILE;" in namespace std, but
struct _IO_FILE has not been declared yet so the compiler assumes it is in
namespace std and later refuses to convert stdout to a std::FILE*. It would be
sufficient to declare _IO_FILE (in the global namespace) before this typedef.

pthread.h declares __jmp_buf_tag in the global namespace but setjmp.h declares
it in namespace std. This means the declarations for __sigsetjmp that follow
don't match.

locale.h: I believe __BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD could be moved before the definition
of struct lconv.

In wchar.h, I can read there is a workaround for gcc stddef.h that puts wint_t
in the global namespace, but if I modify stddef.h to put wint_t in namespace std
and define _WINT_T, the functions declared in namespace __c99 or in the global
namespace have trouble with wint_t not being visible.

wchar.h: the declaration of struct tm looks like this:
__BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
struct tm;
__USING_NAMESPACE_STD(tm)
__END_NAMESPACE_STD
My guess is that the last 2 lines are in the wrong order.
Functions like wcscpy, wcscat or wcscmp should be in namespace std, not __c99.

I almost started my tests by replacing __c99 by std in sys/cdefs.h to remove
some errors. I was surprised to see __c99 was not made a subnamespace of std
(and there is no using namespace std in __c99), but I guess there are reasons.

-- 
           Summary: _GLIBCPP_USE_NAMESPACES issues
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.4
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


             reply	other threads:[~2006-05-02 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-02 17:08 marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org [this message]
2007-02-17 18:44 ` [Bug libc/2633] " drepper at redhat dot com
2007-02-19 17:09 ` marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
2007-10-07 20:30 ` drepper at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060502170845.2633.marc.glisse@normalesup.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).