From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9161 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 17:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9021 invoked by uid 48); 17 May 2006 17:12:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:12:00 -0000 From: "malitzke at metronets dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20060517171248.2671.malitzke@metronets.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/2671] New: On powerpc the order of parameters in weak_alias is significant X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 List-Id: The unmodified weak_alias, as shown the the weak_alias.diff patch shown below gives compilation errors on current snapshot and CVS 2.3.6 and 2.4 glibc. The unmodifed _equivalent_ forms on i[3456]x86 work fine. -weak_alias (getsockname, __getsockname) +weak_alias (__getsockname, getsockname) The modification was tested on both glibc 2.3.6 and 2.4 snapshots over several weeks now. The compilations were attempted with current gcc-4.2.0 and current snapshot binutils. The exist a more severe problem farther down in the powerpc glibc compilation subject of a forthcoming PR. -- Summary: On powerpc the order of parameters in weak_alias is significant Product: glibc Version: 2.4 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libc AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com ReportedBy: malitzke at metronets dot com CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2671 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.